The Nobel Prize went to the pseudo-uridine-alators. *My made up word. Of course - it always goes to scientists who created the most harmful inventions.
Good morning beautiful world and beautiful people who care 😘💖 *Twitter is depressing, I should stay off Twitter for my mental health. ;-)
A study made it through the peer review journal process by being extremely upbeat and positive about how great mrNA technology will be once this teeny tiny problem, that causes a 25% error rate in protein production, is fixed….(which is impossible as the error is caused by the pseudo-uridinalation (spelling?) and without the pseudo-uridinalation the mRnA would break down too quickly to make much of any proteins.
This is BIG NEWS , in other words, the jabs are causing cells to make random unknown proteins a large percentage of the time. There might be 75% of the “planned” chimeric spike and 25% totally unknown mistake proteins. “Scientists” would be totally unable to predict what adverse effects may be caused by these unknown proteins.
*And by “Hamlet” the implications is that with gobs of cells busily making randomly wrong proteins, it is pretty likely that some of the proteins will be functional in some harmful way - and we would not really be able to know what is going on in the person or how to stop it.
Lengthy write up, read more from Jeff Childers:
https://twitter.com/jchilders98/status/1732872060253163526?t=LSBmqvW1wRHocqPIaO3IyA&s=19
Or read more on Substack - this post contains the same text in the second part:
The article about the Nobel Prize going to pseudo-uridinalation: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03046-x
The article about the peer review study closes with a quote from it that reveals the random proteins are a “massive risk”. Immunity against the random proteins may occur too, and if the randomness made a human like protein then autoimmune antibodies would be attacking all other proteins in the body which were similar. https://archive.ph/sJ3ic#selection-2303.61-2307.8
The peer review article is Open Access and the tip from Jeff Childers is to download it before it is retracted. His discussion suggests it only made it through the peer review process because of the upbeat perky optimism about how great mRNA technology will be once this little itty bitty problem is corrected. 🤔 His troll-ie replies suggest that, No, the jabs are not going to be retracted because of this finding. And they may be right - the cullers want to hurt people - it is critically important to start believing that.
Mulroney, et al., 2024: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06800-3
Note that the suggested way to fix the random error problem is to not pseudo-uridinalate the mRNA and that wouldn't work because normal mRNA is broken down so fast the antibody production goal would be unlikely to be reached (which was a bad goal anyway because human cells are not supposed to express viral proteins on their surface or that cell will be targeted for removal by white blood cells. The mRNA “vaccine” goal inherently sets up autoimmune issues in recipients
Flashback meme used in my post linked below. In my earlier years writing online I thought it would be pretty cool to discover something important enough to be awarded a Nobel Prize and then I saw the prizes going for stuff like CRISPR gene editing and it became clear that the Ignoble Award is more legitimate.
The other thing to keep in mind is that exosomes do exist and jab recipients could be spewing out exosomes that have surface proteins of the desired chimeric spike OR any other randomly produced proteins AND those exosomes can be exhaled or sweated out and can transfect - make another person's cells start making foreign proteins, which might randomly be even more different from the chimeric spike. It has so many pathogenic sequences that the chances of something negative being formed seem good to me rather than slim-to-none.
Do check out the Tweet post or Jeff Childers Substack, it is a full length blog discussion of the peer review article. https://twitter.com/jchilders98/status/1732872060253163526?t=Ub9pueLXq1FWxp5o39EF8Q&s=19
Geoff Pain, Phd, has thoughts on the topic too, https://twitter.com/FluoridePoison/status/1733099736494756283?t=dVkzLdMRviW6ithElpJpMA&s=19, his linked Substack post:
This is not really fine at all.
Pfizer was used by the US Dept. of Defense to make a deadly prototype for a huge profit while faking out the public about it being a normal medical product with a normal clinical trial. It might seem like karma that their stock value is dropping but the long-term isn’t going to be very long it seems to me. Cataclysmic poleshift really is on the way and our bizarre weather with temperatures switching 60 degrees Fahrenheit overnight is an indicator of that. We are in end stages of the culling. The mega-rich have underground bunkers in regions expected to be less at risk for earthquake damage.
Judy Mikovits told us there would be wrong gene fragments right away, 2021, and said injection vials should be tested to see if the mRNA was even correct in the first place. She was proven to be right.
The important point to remember is that if culling is the goal, then harm to individuals IS THE GOAL and therefore it doesn't matter how exactly the harm happens. Chemtrails really do seem to be spewing toxins over everything. 😡🤬😭🦋🦆🌱This is evil. 😈
My impression is that the purposeful culling has been happening since the 1950’s at least, if not early 1900’s with Rockefeller turning “healthcare” into a petroleum product industry. And it seems to me that the cullers learned through their various attempts that people are harder to kill than they expected, at least when trying to cull millions or billions of people. On the other hand infertility is a rapidly growing industry so their creeper methods may be working just gradually.
Get your iodine levels up and magnesium - my two cents for you (and pomegranate peel of course ;-).
I am more than a little annoyed that pomegranate peel is not being embraced as a natural antidote by CoV health activists. Ivermectin seriously could be a dangerous drug for anyone who has hyperinflammation causing leaky gut and blood brain barrier membranes.
~~~
Addition - Vonu asked about my Ivermectin comment, my reply:
Not with the typical use for parasitic infections, but with the massive publicity campaign for using it for LongCovid, it might be. It is a large molecule that normally is not a risk to the brain because it is too large to pass through the blood brain barrier - BUT if a person is super inflamed/LongCovid/slow recovery, then they may have poor membrane function and they may have a leaky blood brain barrier. Dmitry Katz was SUPER DUPER against it, so I looked into it more. He is an odd duck, but often was not wrong.
"First, ivermectin penetrates the mammalian brain poorly, so it does not exert any pharmacological effects via mammalian ligand-gated ion channels in the brain unless it is used at high, potentially toxic doses or the blood-brain barrier is functionally impaired." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36645121/ The authors are not recommending that ivermectin be considered suitable for treating patients with epilepsy.
~~~
Please remember that “medical doctors” tend to only know about “medicine” and not about “restoring function naturally”.
Addition - Timothy Winey just shared this link about “The Great Iodine Debate” - it is more of a shill fed disinformation campaign that is decades old, rather than a ‘debate’. westonaprice.org/health-topics/modern-diseases/the-great-iodine-debate/#gsc.tab=0 It is more like the “no virus” debate.
Disclaimer: This information is being provided for educational purposes within the guidelines of Fair Use and is not intended to provide individual health guidance.
"pseudo-uridinalation (spelling?)" I'd think pseudo-uridinylation.
"Judy Mikovits told us there would be wrong gene fragments right away, 2021, and said injection vials should be tested to see if the mRNA was even correct in the first place. She was proven to be right."
Yep - Dr. Dolores Cahill also expressed similar concerns.
JD - "exosomes do exist and jab recipients could be spewing out exosomes that have surface proteins of the desired chimeric spike OR any other randomly produced proteins - This is Evil"
Alex, Intended Consequences for $800. Trebek: This is a byproduct of mRNA vaccination.
What is passive immunization? and there are 6 billion "stable" transfectants in that cull Agent Scully.