"Judy Mikovits told us there would be wrong gene fragments right away, 2021, and said injection vials should be tested to see if the mRNA was even correct in the first place. She was proven to be right."
Yep - Dr. Dolores Cahill also expressed similar concerns.
JD - "exosomes do exist and jab recipients could be spewing out exosomes that have surface proteins of the desired chimeric spike OR any other randomly produced proteins - This is Evil"
Alex, Intended Consequences for $800. Trebek: This is a byproduct of mRNA vaccination.
What is passive immunization? and there are 6 billion "stable" transfectants in that cull Agent Scully.
Too bad with passive exposure exosomes we were/are getting daily 'boosters', and that was by design. It was known that mRNA 'vaccine' was a way to cause infertility in a wild animal population with a need to only inject some of the animals. The exosomes spread the gene editing to the rest of the population of animals.
Not with the typical use for parasitic infections, but with the massive publicity campaign for using it for LongCovid, it might be. It is a large molecule that normally is not a risk to the brain because it is too large to pass through the blood brain barrier - BUT if a person is super inflamed/LongCovid/slow recovery, then they may have poor membrane function and they may have a leaky blood brain barrier. Dmitry Katz was SUPER DUPER against it, so I looked into it more. He is an odd duck, but often was not wrong.
"First, ivermectin penetrates the mammalian brain poorly, so it does not exert any pharmacological effects via mammalian ligand-gated ion channels in the brain unless it is used at high, potentially toxic doses or the blood-brain barrier is functionally impaired." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36645121/ The authors are recommending that ivermectin should not be considered suitable for treating patients with epilepsy, as it was being considered for that purpose.
"pseudo-uridinalation (spelling?)" I'd think pseudo-uridinylation.
"Judy Mikovits told us there would be wrong gene fragments right away, 2021, and said injection vials should be tested to see if the mRNA was even correct in the first place. She was proven to be right."
Yep - Dr. Dolores Cahill also expressed similar concerns.
JD - "exosomes do exist and jab recipients could be spewing out exosomes that have surface proteins of the desired chimeric spike OR any other randomly produced proteins - This is Evil"
Alex, Intended Consequences for $800. Trebek: This is a byproduct of mRNA vaccination.
What is passive immunization? and there are 6 billion "stable" transfectants in that cull Agent Scully.
Yeah ⚰️⚰️⚰️⚰️⚰️⚰️⚰️⚰️⚰️⚰️⚰️⚰️⚰️⚰️ very sad
Transfection cells to make them make ANY protein the body does not recognize as self is to risk auto-immunity.
Thanks. Sounds like what I thought is the risk, but I don't like to overstate what I don't know enough about.
I think they are pseudo - urinators - I feel pissed on.
haha
https://timothywiney.substack.com/p/trusting-the-science-through-the
Too bad with passive exposure exosomes we were/are getting daily 'boosters', and that was by design. It was known that mRNA 'vaccine' was a way to cause infertility in a wild animal population with a need to only inject some of the animals. The exosomes spread the gene editing to the rest of the population of animals.
Ivermectin is harmful?
Every drug is harmful to someone somewhere. Which is why all medicine is based on risk-to-benefit ratios.
....but you never hear that from Pierre Kory or the other doctors who are pushing it.
Not with the typical use for parasitic infections, but with the massive publicity campaign for using it for LongCovid, it might be. It is a large molecule that normally is not a risk to the brain because it is too large to pass through the blood brain barrier - BUT if a person is super inflamed/LongCovid/slow recovery, then they may have poor membrane function and they may have a leaky blood brain barrier. Dmitry Katz was SUPER DUPER against it, so I looked into it more. He is an odd duck, but often was not wrong.
"First, ivermectin penetrates the mammalian brain poorly, so it does not exert any pharmacological effects via mammalian ligand-gated ion channels in the brain unless it is used at high, potentially toxic doses or the blood-brain barrier is functionally impaired." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36645121/ The authors are recommending that ivermectin should not be considered suitable for treating patients with epilepsy, as it was being considered for that purpose.
MDR1 gene fault should be checked for before you have IVM.