What does a Pultizer Prize winning "woman" think is the universal access to femaleness?
The anus. *Post uses body part labels without euphemisms. I am tired of shaming sexuality and sexual body parts. We have bodies. Please accept that.
A not embeddable Tweet (none are embeddable on Substack - Twitter policy) and a long one with the new Twitter blue check services is copied here in screenshots because I think it is important. Big voices in the transwoman movement seem to be focused on ‘femaleness’ as being submissively dominated by males and humiliated by males. “Anal sex” is femaleness. No it is not. Anal sex is more homosexual.
TMI while on the body part series (next up is a post on breast cancer) - I have been told that anal sex feels little like penetration in a vagina. The vulva muscles are constricting along the entire length of the vagina, in waves. Probably a little like the wavelike peristalsis of intestinal smooth muscle. The anal sphincter at the opening of the anus is the only area with constriction during anal sex, going deeper is still only getting stimulation at the muscular sphincter. And there are risks. It is not uncommon for frequent anal sex to cause the sphincter to leak - anal seepage and adult diapers then a need. And that may occur within just a decade or less of being sexually active in that way. Anal sex is not access to ‘femaleness’ in my opinion. Yet that author just won a Pulitzer Prize (Andrea Long Chu, see below). That really just sounds like someone who likes anal sex with men but doesn’t want to call themselves a gay man.
Trans-agenda is political and we need to work together to block this redefinition of life.
Addition - follow the money: Jennifer Bilek has a lengthy article (2018) delving into who is funding the LGB and more recently LGBT movement and sudden influx of clinics and research and media support?
Who Are the Rich, White Men Institutionalizing Transgender Ideology?, By: Jennifer Bilek, Feb 20, 2018, (thefederalist).
The Pulitzer Prize winner, *Tweet stating that: (twitter.com/Rob_ThaBuilder)
“Autogynephelia describes […] the basic structure of all human sexuality.”
“The assimilation of any erotic image is by nature, female.” […]
“At bottom everyone is a sissy...”
“The asshole [is] a universal vagina through which femaleness can always be accessed.” - Andrea Long Chu
https://twitter.com/Rob_ThaBuilder/status/1665787544162762756?t=kpW6tV1QvWEhoAF65sK8zg&s=19
Real trans kids are not focused on sex. It is more about playing rough active games vs quiet social play.
“I want to be sexually objectified.” '- Jacob Tobia
Sorry honey, we don't always get what we want.
“There is something about being treated like shit by men that feels like affirmation itself, like a cry of delight from the deepest cavern of my breast…
To be the victim of honest, undisguised sexism possesses an exhilarating vitality.” - Grace Lavery
“The desire to protect the “innocence of children” is not incompatible with abuse of the worst kind. Kids aren’t innocent. Innocence is a myth promulgated to dominate young people’s bodies.” - Grace Lavery, Assoc. Prof of English at UC Berkeley and expert in trans studies.
Abusing children in the worst kind of way is very much incompatible with actually protecting the innocence of children. Having a desire to protect children while abusing them horrifically is still horrific abuse - FYI. Children do start life with innocence. This person seems dangerous.
Children who grew up with abuse tend to develop a feeling that they deserve it and then will seek it out. It is not uncommon for adult survivors of child abuse to have learned core messages of “I am bad,” “I deserve punishment,” and “I don’t deserve love,” as toddlers center everything around themselves. Angry adults means the toddler caused the adults to be angry and needs to learn how to somehow magically behave in a way that prevents them from being angry - which isn’t possible or not always. Narcissists or emotional abusers will train you to do what they want by devaluing you except for when you are pleasing them.
These people are messed up and seeking humiliation and/or male attention. They seem gay but not wanting to say it that way. They want to be female and compete with other females for straight male attention. A gay man might not be attracted to “a woman” or he wouldn't be gay. Or compete with other lesbians for lesbians. Lesbians are leaving dating apps because the lesbian sites are being flooded with transwomen. If a person with a penis is sexually attracted to females than they fall into Talmud category #1 yet are dressing like #8. This is new.
What would be common sense would be for transmales and transfemales to meet up and see if they hit it off - presurgery. No one should be messing up functioning body parts, period. In my opinion at least. Any surgery is a risk for nerve damage and scar tissue.
Disclaimer: This information is being shared for educational purposes within the guidelines of Fair Use and is not intended to provide individual health guidance.
A big part of the problem: There have always been 2 recognized overall categories, in Psychology, of men or people who like to dress up as the opposite sex. That is until now. It was always recognized until recently that there were Transexuals, people who actually have gender dysphoria, and Transvestites, usually biological men who get an actual sexual charge, or experience arousal out of dressing up. The people behind this agenda no longer recognize this distinction and are actively trying to make it disappear, like it never existed. The actual Transvestites now make up a large and growing portion of the so called "Trans Community" but no distinction is being made any more. Transvestitism used to be considered a mental disorder but now these people have cart blanc to parade around in public, even in schools, in a constant state of arousal. What could go wrong????????
I can’t figure out which sex each of them is so I don’t even know how to judge the spin of what they’re saying.