It is hard to do the self-care that is needed, let alone learn and afford and prepare it. And take it, try it, eat it, gulp it down even if yucky (the pudding is bonus health food item in life).
In the wild times we are in, I try to keep an open mind and I'm a skeptic at heart. The snake venom thing and Stew are questionable. My gut says something is off. I saw "Died Suddenly" as well. It feels like absurd ideas are being planted to ultimately discredit a point of view apart from the narrative.
So yes, exactly. I reread what you wrote - that is the problem in a nutshell. Snake venom like effects are a problem and Ardis makes it sound kind of crazy. His more recent work was clearer though. Snake venom or toxin organoids - biotech rather than a parasite, but lifelike and producing toxins of varied types, some with the snake venom/conotoxin cholinergic effects.
Appreciate you elaborating. First hand anecdotal experience is not to be overlooked or dismissed outright. There's also an air of anything is possible with what has been done already.
Urine samples from CoV patients did find conotoxin and other odd/not-supposed-to-be-there toxins. That link is in one of my posts on this topic. I have been writing about it since May 2021/June.
They sensationalized things and don't seem to have a real scientist on board to fact check stories first.
The snake venom like paralytic effect is real for the jab version in my first-hand experience. I was not recovering in 2021 after spending hours in a busy medical office (and maybe my parents got jabs that day) until I added nicotine, with symptoms that were similar to when I had early outbreak illness in 2020. My usual methods weren't working though. Colitis, lost 30 pounds in a month, not good. I have stayed on the nicotine lozenges because I like the effect on my ADHD/concentration.
My question is whether there was a highlight on nAChRs issues at a mass level prior to the snake venom theory. The tragedy of our expending so much effort fighting backwards to assign culpability and the trace the origin story — which are needed pursuits — is that too much energy and focus is self assigned there. You have spoken passionately about getting on with solutions Jennifer. The corruption of the data and massive underreporting, together with the failure to develop case histories and linked syndromic data for all cases is an unbearable and persistent tragedy. We need big data done well — as many in academic medicine postulated to characterize and associate syndromic features, organ - cell - vessel - tissue states etc that correspond to these features, maps of the pathways, AND THERAPIES characterized by effect in population in setting, etc. The phrase Learning Healthcare System was intended to encompass big data and exquisite classification and categorization that could evolve and rapidly update. If there was ever an application for AI and deep learning, it is here and now. I am led to conclude that the whole movement in medicine wasn’t much more than smoke and mirrors for generations of grants. I did see Dr Bruce Patterson do some high class work early to define some types of Long Covid and a verifiable therapy set. So I am sure it’s being done, but this discovery should be at a Marshall Plan Level and involve personalized medicine approaches as well as mass data mining. Yet, we keep chasing these weasels at NIH. We need Congress and our leaders to move forward on curatives and the mechanisms of curatives associated w pathophysiology Of all the potential disease states coming out of the hugely varied bioweapon implantations. For my part and on this Ardis note — I wonder whether just establishing a classification beachhead OF NOTORIETY (important notoriety) is an accomplishment. It’s way easier to have helpful disputation and dialectic discovery around a raging bonfire than a candle in the wind. I am deeply appreciative of Jennifer’s work and gravitas — but there is a railroad to success running through public imagination, even misconceptions that rallied the masses. And frankly, I research citation abuse in the literature and it is rampant. You can see frequent references where the whole paper is cited in some confused way and the time it takes to see what the citation pointed at and what the actual evidential basis was is like the valley of futility. Sometimes there are strings of citations in controversial areas where it’s 4 layers till you get to the original assertion - X cited Y for concept 1 BUT Y is actually citing Z for concept 1 — then it turns out that each author in the line spun or shaded the data. The garbage science scholarship that was put out in the plandemic had a long history starting w the corruption of journals and the loss of the very precise citation style — eg down to the paragraph and sentences on the exact page. Even the Point of Care compendiums U2D make it hard to find which of 3 possible trials referenced produced the evidence backing recommendations — so the physicians users can eyeball the methods without spending 30 minutes tracing papers. So Ardis can maybe improve — but take a look at Citations of the Venerables before we kill a guy trying to start a bonfire. His model name even if it is in error draw out necessary challengers to advance the discussion— and it may even be that scientists of Jennifer’s caliber will add clarification, redefinition, and relational associations as needed.
Regarding the first part of your comment - no nAChRs have always been a fairly silent topic. Dr Tau Brown first brought up the possibility and someone told me about his Facebook posts so I tried nicotine while I was really sick with a passive exposure reaction.
Regarding the need for quality data - yes, I wrote about that a while ago when the SPARS info was circulating - they predicted independent data in their role playing scenario. https://transcendingsquare.com/2021/09/16/epigirl-2/
Did you miss my second part? "His [Ardis] more recent work was clearer though. Snake venom or toxin organoids - biotech rather than a parasite, but lifelike and producing toxins of varied types, some with the snake venom/conotoxin cholinergic effects."
*It is Stew and others that I was collectively referring to as needing a scientist on board. I left one a comment on Substack to that point. At a higher level accountability counts - get a someone to be science editor and trust their word as the not-scientist. I am not really sure who Ardis is besides the earlier video that was missing some basic ground material regarding water and spike - yes it is there, but fecal exposure is more a risk for humans, The water life is being harmed though by spike.
His more recent documentary style was done much more professionally and had more evidence - the organoid toxin producing sstructures. Show me the evidence. I am not 'killing' anyone. I can't find the link though. I think Watch the Water is what I am calling the first one and something more recent exists but try to find it with google, huh.
I hold you up w Mercola and a few others that I read for useful positive insight on what can remedy our health problems. I write to people sometimes and say - Hey check out Jennifer she is great. I’m sorry if I sounded critical because I did read the second part and appreciated your neutrality and taking a look at a potential improvement in his discussion. That is why I closed my entire comment - “ and it may even be that scientists of Jennifer’s caliber will add clarification, redefinition, and relational associations as needed” - because that is exactly what you did. 👍 I understand the association w Stew is problematic and I’m out of that loop. When I saw Ardis he was talking to Mike Adams and had a pictorial rapid review of front pages from literature talking about the parallels between snakebite and Covid. My take away was Nicorette which I used to help my family and that Ardis was excited to be heard — and his thesis was not doctrine but the idea that we know how to treat snakebite and if Covid acts like that, then we get a leg up. I’m agreeing w you about data and also your several times mentioned frustration w the lack of focus on therapies whilst we fixate on bad actors. I think you are really helping people and am getting my family on pomegranate. And I totally took in your thoughts about adhd and nicotine. I remain your fan — although I guess this Ardis discussion irritates me BUT not at you — at the Ardis bashers - and sorry I wasn’t clear. You are actually a helpful voice in this and someone who is looking for the truth. I have no idea if he’s onto something or not, but if he was correct about the simple thesis I heard on Adams show, then I like to see what else he’s got. Thanks for your reply Jennifer and all your work.
I think he is onto something. My point about science editor was to strengthen the various alt news reports. Stew, Dr. Jane, and Karen Kingston make important points, but when errors are included it weakens the entire counter narrative. They need to know more about exosomes. I need to figure out making videos myself. People don't read, I just prefer writing, or want a cameraman.
Thanks for clarifying. I have taken so much flack, for so long, that it is difficult to feel good about myself or my work.
In the wild times we are in, I try to keep an open mind and I'm a skeptic at heart. The snake venom thing and Stew are questionable. My gut says something is off. I saw "Died Suddenly" as well. It feels like absurd ideas are being planted to ultimately discredit a point of view apart from the narrative.
So yes, exactly. I reread what you wrote - that is the problem in a nutshell. Snake venom like effects are a problem and Ardis makes it sound kind of crazy. His more recent work was clearer though. Snake venom or toxin organoids - biotech rather than a parasite, but lifelike and producing toxins of varied types, some with the snake venom/conotoxin cholinergic effects.
Appreciate you elaborating. First hand anecdotal experience is not to be overlooked or dismissed outright. There's also an air of anything is possible with what has been done already.
I have a lot of information gathered on the topic of the nAChRs and the various odd symptoms that started with jab season.
Menstrual irregularities:
The alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is involved in a direct inhibitory effect of nicotine on GnRH release: In vitro studies - ScienceDirect
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0303720717303982#!
nAChRs would reduce the prostaglandin signaling that affects the HPG axis.
This Substack is focusing on other endotoxins, LPS, and SEB maybe. https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/extreme-toxicity-of-endotoxins-in
Non-fuctioning nAChRs couldn't inhibit prostaglandin signaling.
Urine samples from CoV patients did find conotoxin and other odd/not-supposed-to-be-there toxins. That link is in one of my posts on this topic. I have been writing about it since May 2021/June.
They sensationalized things and don't seem to have a real scientist on board to fact check stories first.
The snake venom like paralytic effect is real for the jab version in my first-hand experience. I was not recovering in 2021 after spending hours in a busy medical office (and maybe my parents got jabs that day) until I added nicotine, with symptoms that were similar to when I had early outbreak illness in 2020. My usual methods weren't working though. Colitis, lost 30 pounds in a month, not good. I have stayed on the nicotine lozenges because I like the effect on my ADHD/concentration.
My question is whether there was a highlight on nAChRs issues at a mass level prior to the snake venom theory. The tragedy of our expending so much effort fighting backwards to assign culpability and the trace the origin story — which are needed pursuits — is that too much energy and focus is self assigned there. You have spoken passionately about getting on with solutions Jennifer. The corruption of the data and massive underreporting, together with the failure to develop case histories and linked syndromic data for all cases is an unbearable and persistent tragedy. We need big data done well — as many in academic medicine postulated to characterize and associate syndromic features, organ - cell - vessel - tissue states etc that correspond to these features, maps of the pathways, AND THERAPIES characterized by effect in population in setting, etc. The phrase Learning Healthcare System was intended to encompass big data and exquisite classification and categorization that could evolve and rapidly update. If there was ever an application for AI and deep learning, it is here and now. I am led to conclude that the whole movement in medicine wasn’t much more than smoke and mirrors for generations of grants. I did see Dr Bruce Patterson do some high class work early to define some types of Long Covid and a verifiable therapy set. So I am sure it’s being done, but this discovery should be at a Marshall Plan Level and involve personalized medicine approaches as well as mass data mining. Yet, we keep chasing these weasels at NIH. We need Congress and our leaders to move forward on curatives and the mechanisms of curatives associated w pathophysiology Of all the potential disease states coming out of the hugely varied bioweapon implantations. For my part and on this Ardis note — I wonder whether just establishing a classification beachhead OF NOTORIETY (important notoriety) is an accomplishment. It’s way easier to have helpful disputation and dialectic discovery around a raging bonfire than a candle in the wind. I am deeply appreciative of Jennifer’s work and gravitas — but there is a railroad to success running through public imagination, even misconceptions that rallied the masses. And frankly, I research citation abuse in the literature and it is rampant. You can see frequent references where the whole paper is cited in some confused way and the time it takes to see what the citation pointed at and what the actual evidential basis was is like the valley of futility. Sometimes there are strings of citations in controversial areas where it’s 4 layers till you get to the original assertion - X cited Y for concept 1 BUT Y is actually citing Z for concept 1 — then it turns out that each author in the line spun or shaded the data. The garbage science scholarship that was put out in the plandemic had a long history starting w the corruption of journals and the loss of the very precise citation style — eg down to the paragraph and sentences on the exact page. Even the Point of Care compendiums U2D make it hard to find which of 3 possible trials referenced produced the evidence backing recommendations — so the physicians users can eyeball the methods without spending 30 minutes tracing papers. So Ardis can maybe improve — but take a look at Citations of the Venerables before we kill a guy trying to start a bonfire. His model name even if it is in error draw out necessary challengers to advance the discussion— and it may even be that scientists of Jennifer’s caliber will add clarification, redefinition, and relational associations as needed.
Regarding the first part of your comment - no nAChRs have always been a fairly silent topic. Dr Tau Brown first brought up the possibility and someone told me about his Facebook posts so I tried nicotine while I was really sick with a passive exposure reaction.
Regarding the need for quality data - yes, I wrote about that a while ago when the SPARS info was circulating - they predicted independent data in their role playing scenario. https://transcendingsquare.com/2021/09/16/epigirl-2/
Did you miss my second part? "His [Ardis] more recent work was clearer though. Snake venom or toxin organoids - biotech rather than a parasite, but lifelike and producing toxins of varied types, some with the snake venom/conotoxin cholinergic effects."
*It is Stew and others that I was collectively referring to as needing a scientist on board. I left one a comment on Substack to that point. At a higher level accountability counts - get a someone to be science editor and trust their word as the not-scientist. I am not really sure who Ardis is besides the earlier video that was missing some basic ground material regarding water and spike - yes it is there, but fecal exposure is more a risk for humans, The water life is being harmed though by spike.
His more recent documentary style was done much more professionally and had more evidence - the organoid toxin producing sstructures. Show me the evidence. I am not 'killing' anyone. I can't find the link though. I think Watch the Water is what I am calling the first one and something more recent exists but try to find it with google, huh.
I hold you up w Mercola and a few others that I read for useful positive insight on what can remedy our health problems. I write to people sometimes and say - Hey check out Jennifer she is great. I’m sorry if I sounded critical because I did read the second part and appreciated your neutrality and taking a look at a potential improvement in his discussion. That is why I closed my entire comment - “ and it may even be that scientists of Jennifer’s caliber will add clarification, redefinition, and relational associations as needed” - because that is exactly what you did. 👍 I understand the association w Stew is problematic and I’m out of that loop. When I saw Ardis he was talking to Mike Adams and had a pictorial rapid review of front pages from literature talking about the parallels between snakebite and Covid. My take away was Nicorette which I used to help my family and that Ardis was excited to be heard — and his thesis was not doctrine but the idea that we know how to treat snakebite and if Covid acts like that, then we get a leg up. I’m agreeing w you about data and also your several times mentioned frustration w the lack of focus on therapies whilst we fixate on bad actors. I think you are really helping people and am getting my family on pomegranate. And I totally took in your thoughts about adhd and nicotine. I remain your fan — although I guess this Ardis discussion irritates me BUT not at you — at the Ardis bashers - and sorry I wasn’t clear. You are actually a helpful voice in this and someone who is looking for the truth. I have no idea if he’s onto something or not, but if he was correct about the simple thesis I heard on Adams show, then I like to see what else he’s got. Thanks for your reply Jennifer and all your work.
I think he is onto something. My point about science editor was to strengthen the various alt news reports. Stew, Dr. Jane, and Karen Kingston make important points, but when errors are included it weakens the entire counter narrative. They need to know more about exosomes. I need to figure out making videos myself. People don't read, I just prefer writing, or want a cameraman.
Thanks for clarifying. I have taken so much flack, for so long, that it is difficult to feel good about myself or my work.