The U.S. scores on the 2016 Social Progress Index have dropped
Compared to 133 other nations the U.S. ranked fifth for GDP per capita which would make the U.S. one of the richest nations however citizens may not be benefiting from the wealth as much as citizens in some other developed nations.
"Worse, the U.S. joins China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia in a group of countries that significantly underperform on social progress relative to their wealth. The U.S. is the only major industrial nation to significantly underperform in this way. By contrast, countries such as Costa Rica, Nepal, and Malawi have much lower levels of economic and social development than the U.S., but these countries are overperforming. They are doing a good job at turning their GDP into social progress; the U.S. is not." ["Why Americans are So Angry Despite America's Strong Economy," Michael Green, Aug. 2, 2016, hbr.org]
The rankings for the 2016 Social Progress Index are based on the total group of 133 nations so fifth out of 133 for GDP per capita would be equivalent to 3.76 out of 100 or roughly 96% out of 100 which in the U.S. educational system would be graded as an 'A'.
Other categories, reranked for grades based on percentage of a 100, would place the U.S.:
in the 'A' group for "Access to advanced education" (ranked 2/133 or 1.5/100) (2017 1/128) and "Shelter" (7/133 or 5.3/100) (2017 10/128)
and an 'A-' for "Opportunity Total" (13/133 or 9.8/100). (2017 13/128)
The U.S. might get graded:
a 'B+' for "Personal Freedom and choice" (16/133 or 12.0/100) (2017 19/128)
and a 'B' for "Social Progress Overall" (19/133 or 14.3/100) (2017 18/128) and for "Access to info/communication" (19/133 or 14.3/100) (2017 27/128) and for "Basic Human Needs Total" (21/133 or 15.8/100) (2017 17/128) and for "Tolerance and inclusion" (21/133 or 15.8/100), (2017 23/128)
and a 'B-' for "Personal Rights" (26/133 or 19.5/100). (2017 19/128)
And the U.S. might get graded:
a 'C+' for "Water and sanitation" (27/133 or 20.3/100) (2017 27/128) and for "Personal Safety" (27/133 or 20.3/100) (2017 21/128),
and a 'C' for "Foundations of Well-Being Total" (32/133 or 24.1/100), (2017 29/128)
and a 'C-' for "Environmental Quality" (36/133 or 27.1/100) (2017 33/128) and for "Nutrition and basic medical care" (37/133 or 27.8/100). (2017 36/128)
And the U.S. might get graded:
a 'D+' for "Access to basic knowledge" (40/133 or 30.1/100). (2017 30/128)
And the U.S. might get graded:
an 'E-' for "Health and Wellness" (69/133 or 51.9/100). (20177 34/128)
At some point the U.S.'s failing grade on Health and Wellness will make it difficult for the nation to continue to have enough healthy workers to pay for the care of the sick and disabled citizens let alone provide enough caregivers to continue to be able to take care of all of the people unable to care for themselves. Enforcing the purchase or provision of health insurance doesn't automatically provide more health care professionals or provide more health care facilities -- let alone assure that the care that is being provided is actually effective at resolving the underlying health issues rather than simply managing symptoms with treatments that might be exacerbating the underlying issues.
And what if the problem with the poor showing on "Health and wellness" isn't just an ineffective or understaffed health care system but is actually a problem with excessive negative chemicals in our food supply and environment? It would be difficult to remain healthy in an environment that provides excessive amounts of toxins and insufficient nutrients to cope with the needs of detoxification adequately.
Or maybe U.S. citizens simply all started eating too much and exercising too little sometime around 1992 and the halving of male fertility is just a fluke (not quite halved - 1.7 children on average in 1992 dropped to 0.9 children on average between 2006-2010) *. Maybe. Coincidences do happen -- and more and more often it seems in this modern era. But as I don't believe in coincidences as much as I believe in evidence based science I'll continue to avoid the toxins that I've become aware of and continue to work on sharing information about the underlying causes of health and wellness (the big secret is that functional bodies are made out of a balanced variety of all of the nutrients, {and a good night's sleep and regular exercise and clean air and water}, rather than being made out of pharmaceuticals or toxins .)
*Excerpt from the last post:
Male fertility in 1992 was estimated to be at a rate of 1710 births per 1000 males on average (or 1.7 children per male aged 15-44) and 1960 births per every 1000 females (or 1.9 children per female aged 15-44). https://www.census.gov/population/documentation/twps0014.pdf
However either fertility has decreased or the desire to father children has decreased because the rate of children fathered by men aged 15-44 years in 2002 was at a rate of 1.0 children per male and the rate dropped yet more to 0.9 children per male aged 15-44 years between 2006-2010. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr051.pdf
A different excerpt (that was not included in the last post) suggests that fertility rates for females as well as males born in the U.S. may also have been affected because fertility rates were greater for Hispanic men and women who had moved to the U.S. compared to Hispanic women who were born in the U.S.:
"Looking at nativity, higher percentages of foreign-born Hispanic men and women had a child compared with those born in the United States. For foreign-born Hispanic women, 78% had a biological child compared with 51% of U.S.-born Hispanic women. The percentage of U.S.-born Hispanic women with a biological child is similar to that of white women." http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr051.pdf
The birth rate for Hispanic women and men was greater than for white women and men:
"Hispanic women are more likely to have had a biological child (65%) than non-Hispanic white women (52%), but there were no differences between Hispanic and non-Hispanic black (62%) women. Meanwhile, a higher percentage of Hispanic men had a biological child (54%) compared with both white (41%) and black (49%) men." http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr051.pdf
If tradition is important to a person then it might be a good idea to start asking why our traditions are no longer working as they traditionally used to - maybe foreign born people have greater birth rates because their bodies are less full of toxins and less nutritionally depleted.
The primaries are finally over and I haven't withdrawn from the 2016 presidential race - yet. I was waiting for the primary process before starting to campaign as an Independent candidate - but that was too long to wait. The current system favors the two main parties by spending so much time on the primaries. The timelines for ballot access are closing soon or have closed already in some states. [Utah] Write-in ballot access can be applied for in some areas within a month or two of the election. For a presidential candidate to apply for ballot access as a write-in candidate they need to file with the state and include a list of registered voters in the state who are willing to act as electoral representatives for the candidate and the name of the Vice Presidential candidate has to be given.
Writing in Bernie Sanders name on a ballot if he hasn't filed with the state is most likely to get the whole ballot added to the 'don't count' pile. Leaving a section blank and voting on other sections may reduce the risk of a ballot being added to the 'don't count' pile.
My Presidential Platform is a plan to turn that "E" from a failing grade into an E for excellence.
Effective Health Care - a preventative healthcare, not-for profit single payer system.
End Citizens United & reform campaign finance and voting transparency laws
Education -- Repeal or rewrite the No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top policies to create a public education system that promotes helping the child to maximize their own potential - whatever it is. -- Require all under graduate education providers to teach evolution and a science based curriculum. -- Reduce college tuition loan rates and work towards restoring public education subsidies for in state college tuition.
Effective health care and more Green Jobs for the Economy and Environment are all goals that reinforce each other -- we can't be healthy or very productive over the long term if our environment and food supply are too toxic to support health for us or our wildlife and farm animals and crops.
I will add links for more information regarding each of the platform categories.
Here's the website with the page of 2017 data for the U.S.. Any of the countries can be chosen from a menu and displayed. https://www.socialprogressindex.com/?tab=2&code=USA
More about the organization and the Social Progress Index is available on another website. Collaboration and encouragement to make local level or special interest Indexes is part of the goal and examples of a youth index and regional index are available on the site. http://www.socialprogressimperative.org/about-us-what-we-do/
Disclaimer: Opinions are my own and the information is provided for educational purposes within the guidelines of fair use. While I am a Registered Dietitian this information is not intended to provide individual health guidance. Please see a health professional for individual health care purposes.