The Culling? It is for the greater good?
"Seems so," says the Magic 8 Ball. / Toby Rogers - targeted messaging campaign, Steve Kirsch, safety signal muffling with the statistical method used for the vaccines.
I got in a discussion about culling and am copying a reply here. The reply Thread is on a post by Celia Farber about Toby Rogers’ recent post: We are in the midst of the most sophisticated targeted messaging campaign in human history.
My reply supporting calling it a culling:
Negligent manslaughter- the infertility, the menstrual excess, spontaneous abortions, unknown effects on fetal developing ovum genes, may be the goal, experimenting with the trans-humanism goal, and the individual harm isn't a concern over the getting some living guinea pigs for their experiment.
The fact that some areas seem protected, and others targeted is suspicious. The definition of cull is to thin a wild herd by selective removal. Take the weak and old, leave the strong. This situation has been different because the jab is showing true toxin risks - all ages are equally getting side effects which are ranging throughout the body, rather than being a more typical vak side effect of one age group seeing a specific condition as a risk.
There is a great substack on that topic, Steve Kirsch - Proportional reporting ratio - it is long and a bit hard to follow but basically the way the jab side effects is being analyzed is not showing true risk, it mutes it.
It is making a proportion out of side effects - looking for one unusual condition to stand out from all the conditions reported for that vak. Number of myocarditis cases divided by all of the reported side effects for that type vak. In the case of the CoV jabs the "all of the other side effects" number is so huge that only a few things are standing out as "risks" but there are so many reports and problems that some are registering a safety signal with the proportionally mushing of the true problem.
Side effects are showing up throughout the whole body and brain and include quite severe problems and are evenly distributed across all age groups - showing signs of a true toxic effect rather than some odd quirk causing myocarditis in teen males. The Proportional reporting ratio seems designed to look for that single spike and in the CoV jab case we have a swamp of many varied side effects - a huge murky problem - the haystack instead of a needle.
Craig Paardekooper, very early CoV maybe? - https://craigpkooper.wixsite.com/vaccine/reasons-to-be-concerned
His two videos about the VAERS data are on this Reddit page, a couple of the replies are of interest regarding verification: https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticismAU/comments/raq7no/craig_paardekooper_batch_codes_and_toxicity_for/
I am having trouble finding his site. I need to reload Tor and Duck Duck Go.
A debunking article, it doesn’t really get into the data: https://www.thedailybeast.com/craig-paardekoopers-shady-site-shows-covid-anti-vaxxers-will-believe-anything
Addition, also related:
Disclaimer: This information is provided for educational purposes within the guidelines of Fair Use. It is not intended to provide individual guidance. Please seek a health care provider for individualized health care guidance.
Thanks for reading deNutrients - News to Use! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.