Gender dysphoria can be real and biology based.
Truth is needed, not more and more loud voices denying that we do have an increasing rate of nonbinary or homosexual people. Acceptance needs to be about accepting diversity-not surgically altering it
Two days in a row I have seen medical professionals loudly stating that “gender dysphoria” is not real, not seen in mammals even. That is just really untrue, super-duper untrue. Gender dysphoria occurs because the hormonal balance in the mother’s uterus dictates the innate gender behavior patterns while it is the DNA that dictates the shape of the developing fetal body parts.
The issue was first observed in animal studies with litters - if all of the litter was female except for one male, the male would have more feminine behavior patterns (bending over to be mounted, rather than male mounting behavior for example). If all of the litter was male except for one female than the female would display more masculine sexual behavior patterns.
This is biology being politicized in order to deny that it is a problem due to the agricultural and other modern chemicals causing this problem. Until the real cause is admitted the rate of children being born with non-standard instincts is going to continue to increase.
A reply I wrote to a Substack post by Dr. Paul Alexander:
She (Candace Owens) is incorrect. The politicization of gender dysphoria is wrong, but denying that it ever happens biologically is also wrong. It can be a very real issue that occurs during fetal development and the rate is increasing because the cause in part is the increased amount of endocrine disrupting chemicals in our food and environment.
Denying reality is not helpful any more than forcing one way of interpreting reality. Chopping off body parts and destroying future fertility and ability to enjoy sexual health naturally is a way of causing infertility and lack of sexual health in people who simply have a mismatch in their innate behavior patterns and their body parts. Trans men and trans women have had normal babies together. Gender dysphoria is real. Chopping up bodies is not necessary and has little to do with accepting what God gave us. God has to work with what we are doing and what we are doing is causing gender dysphoria due to endocrine disrupting chemicals causing hormonal imbalance during pregnancy.
If the goal is to have gender typical children than start prior to conception with detox and removal of glyphosate and pesticides from your diet. That is what is needed. More methyl donors would also help. Gender dysphoria is an epigenetic issue so next generation of babies wouldn't necessarily have those same epigenetic changes occur.
Recognition of a problem is the first step needed in order to work on changing the problem. Pretending gender dysphoria is not a real problem, and increasing in rate, is denying reality. People can have different solutions for a problem, but recognizing the problem exists is the first step to take. Currently the connection to modern chemicals is being denied by the politicized takeover of the issue. That is also denying the reality of the problem. Chopping off body parts is not going to help detox the person’s body from endocrine disrupting chemicals which may also be leading to neurological degenerative conditions in addition to having affected innate gendered behavior patterns during fetal growth.
When people are lying and being lied to, more lies are not helpful.
Gender dysphoria is a real problem that has occurred over the centuries of human history, but at a rarer rate than it is currently being observed. Suggesting to young people that squashing or chopping their body parts will somehow help their health is a cancer promoting untruth. Just wearing a too tight underwire bra is associated with increased breast cancer risk. Squashing body parts to look like someone else is not affirming someone’s own identity. Why can’t we have sexy men and women who look however they want? Why do we have to have sexuality be about choosing a flag? News update - sex, marriage, and baby carriages, do not have anything to do with flags.
Bigger news update - “asexual” is a symptom not a sexual identity. Low iodine may be a factor leading to asexual feelings and treating that with iodine would help protect against cancer and overall health, energy level, and support an improved intelligence level. It is actively lying and bad for health to suggest that kids can choose asexual as a choice to simply accept. Why simply accept iodine deficiency and breast or prostate cancer as a future risk when being well nourished would be a healthier choice?
The current politicization of gender issues needs to stop and children and families need to hear the real story - chemical pollution is affecting our future. Chopping up body parts is not going to help that problem AT ALL.
Where can we meet to start talking about this realistically? Do we all care about kids? Do we all care about grandkids? Or do some of us really want to promote infertility? That is the real question to ponder. What covert goals are underlying the politicization of gender dysphoria? Is there a goal to promote trans women (unchopped though) as being superior beings - god-like even - like Baphomet allegedly? That is an agenda if it is true and is not supporting individuals to be their own healthiest self.
Trans-women have shown rates of violence that is more similar to male’s rate of violence than females. That is a reality that suggests trans-women are still males too and still need to learn how to control their aggression. It would be a disservice to raise boys to think that they are really a girl because they prefer to wear pretty clothes. They are a boy that likes to wear pretty clothes - let that be okay - let that be accepted in our modern polluted world - because that is our current reality.
Another Substack podcast has an interview with someone claiming that there is no such thing as transgender - and that is just untrue. The speaker shared some very helpful resources and made good points, but as a conclusion “no such thing” is not accurate - not true - still lying to children.
The resources shared by Belissa Cohen with Mickey Z:
Study: Persons with transsexualism, after sex reassignment, have considerably higher risks for mortality, suicidal behavior, and psychiatric morbidity than the general population.
*We are told that trans people need to be protected because they are being murdered just for being trans. When the statistics are examined though, it appears that trans people who work as prostitutes are more at risk for being killed, similarly to prostitutes. Trans people who are not working as prostitutes do not seem to have that much of an increased risk of violence against them just because they are trans.
*We are told to be protective of transkids because they have such an increased risk of suicide. When the statistics are examined though, it appears that suicide risk is worse after transitioning - not reduced - previous link. The super sad information to take home from this article is that ALL young people are suffering more self-harm and other risks than in the past.
“The reported data shows that transgender young people experience high levels of self-harm (84%), suicidal thoughts (92%) and suicide attempts (45%). However, very high albeit slightly lower levels are seen for the non-trans (LGBT) young people.”
The rates are far worse for the non-binary than general population but self-harm and suicidal ideation is happening. Why are our youngsters suffering? should be the question. General population data: self-harm -10%, suicide ideation - 25%, suicide attempt - 13% females, 5% males. Non-trans data: self-harm - 61%, suicide ideation - 70%, suicide attempt - 22%. *data from Stonewall School Report 2017.
It is not helpful to tell children and families that chopping their body up and taking hormones will help them mentally, when what is really needed is to detox from glyphosate and pesticides and provision of adequate iodine and other nutrients. We are not well because we are being poisoned by our food and medication supply.
*This compares the rate of violence between females, males, and transwomen and transmen. Transmen are a little more violent than females, but not as violent on average as males or transwomen. That is a significant research finding.
Click here to see the trans agenda and “victims” in action.
*Some transwomen are being extremely threatening to women who have been trying to advocate for women’s rights to still be respected even though there are political changes making fewer female DNA only locations (like public bathrooms or changing rooms at gyms or schools) - suggesting that it is okay to rape or kill women. In some areas trans politics has been trying to do away with any discussion of female body parts - it might hurt the transwomen’s feelings. Well as a prenatal educator, I talk about the uterus, the cervix and mammary glands - which males also have and can produce milk if an emergency situation led to an infant suckling long enough at the male chest (happened in a lifeboat when lost at sea incident - the baby and man survived). *I am a lactation educator and dietitian, this is my field.
The 11th Hour blog
The solution to political lies and disinformation is not more lies and disinformation. We need to discuss facts and we need to learn more facts and talk about hurt feelings a little less. Yes, we all got feels, and they can get sensitive and hurt. We also all are at extremely increased risk for cancer and neurological degeneration due to pollutants and nutrient deficiency. Maybe we need to think harder about how much we don’t want cancer or Alzheimer’s dementia and less about the color of someone else’s lipstick. I don’t wear any lipstick because it all gives me chapped lips and I am not going to surgically remove my lips, just because my skin is intolerant to tools of modern sex-based discrimination against women.
I say no to lipstick and high heels because I do not think women have to be disabled just because they had the misfortune or good luck to be born with female DNA.
Do I get paid the big bucks of modern lip-sticked feminine life? No, but I am okay with that. I do not sell out my health just because modern life is unhealthy and tries to promote being unhealthy as acceptable and normal. No thanks - keep your lip stick and your sex “power”. I was amazed at how much I heard about lipstick as online communities were trying to give my business world pointers. I am sorry, I refuse to participate in lip stick wearing. I choose not to apply toxins to my lips.
Does that make me a transman? Or just sensible?
Why should my success in life be tied to whether I wear “power” lipstick or not? Women are encouraged to use their “power” - of being sexy - but don’t be too sexy or then you may not get any job that is not sex industry. Attractive women statistically can have an easier time finding a job in female roles - waitress, receptionist, secretary; but may have a harder time finding a job in any other role. Innately, males can be distracted by attractive females and so attractive women don’t get hired for real jobs, just for jobs where the males may want to be distracted. That is sex-based discrimination and I still refuse to wear lipstick.
We got problems, and they aren’t just about flag choices. We are being poisoned and have been since the 1950s in the US. Excess bromide and fluoride and too little iodine has been accumulating for three and a half generations now and the chronic illness rate is reflecting that. With each generation mothers have less iodine for their babies and then their babies have even less for the grandkids.
We are ill because we are being poisoned and starved of essential nutrients.
Lipstick will not help this situation, no matter what color you pick, and no matter what your DNA has to say about your sex.
Gender and sex organs are two separate things which can be affected by modern pollutants during prenatal development. That is BIOLOGICAL FACT.
What is also a fact is that grade school is not a place for Trans Diva Queens - that is a route to later pedophilia and/or an emotional crash once older and no longer a sensationalized Diva Youth getting attention from potential pedophiles. Grade school is a place for swinging on swing-sets, playing kickball, or building sand villages in imaginative role-play - not for learning how to vamp down a runway on high heels and lipstick. Lipstick is toxic, please do not apply toxins to young children. Putting toxic nail-polish on babies is just really stupid and bad for their health.
Disclaimer: This information is being shared for educational purposes within the guidelines of Fair Use and is not intended to provide individual health care guidance. Please seek a functional health practitioner for individual health care guidance.
Thanks for reading deNutrients - News to Use! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.